Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Grosso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Grosso[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Neither Grosso's work as a writer nor as a musician rise to the required level of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing notable about this subject Lubbad85 (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as the subject may meet WP:NAUTHOR criterion 4.c. due to multiple reviews in Publisher's Weekly. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I would argue that Publishers Weekly reviews are not a sign of "significant coverage" since PW is noted for reviewing as many books as it possibly can, rather than for any discrimination in reviewing only the most significant literature. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lacks WP:SIGCOV and does not seem to satisfy Wikipedia's notabillity standards. SSSB (talk) 15:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.